What Works?: a Kenyan Argument for a Rights-Based Approach to Health
Posted in health funding, heraf, heraf conference on Dec 6th, 2008 No Comments »

Hi all…for my first blog entry from the second annual Kenya Health Rights conference I’m beginning at the end..in other words, the best way to start to synthesize the vast amount of data and the number of powerful stories of health rights violations and opportunities presented over the last two days is to look back from the finish line…particularly because we ended with the most salient rationale for a rights-based approach to health…simply put, it works.
Anand Grover, the new UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health and a prominent lawyer and health rights leader in India, ended the conference by walking attendees through this results-based rationale for health rights. As Grover laid it out, whether you’re a health worker and/or citizen of Kenya or India (or, for that matter, the US), it turns out that we’ve already got waves of evidence that reveal the ineffectiveness and inefficiencies of non-rights based health systems.
Example: health system financing…During the conference, for instance, we learned that more than half of all Kenyans pay for health care out-of- pocket. In a country where 56% of Kenyans live on less than $2 a day, the lack of a health financing system based on principles of equity, access, and affordability has direct visceral consequences for a population that already live on the margin. Got asthma?…cough up the money for your life-saving preventive and curative treatments. Break your leg? Expect a crippling assault on your life’s savings and your kids’ chances to eat. Without a rational health financing system, the default is a out-of-pocket system that penalizes the poor and helps to exacerbate rather than address illness and inequity. The absence of rights, speaker after speaker powerfully voiced, equals the absence of health .
What’s the alternative? In Kenya, it turns out the problem is not the absence of alternative health financing tools.. in fact, we heard a variety of local NGO leaders and health care workers debate the merits and drawbacks of several health financing options that exist in some form in Kenya already. We learned of the tax-financed supply-side system largely used to staff public facilities…we learned of a demand-side insurance schemes, including one known as the National Hospital Insurance Fund…we learned of innovative community-based health financing models tied to micro-credit enterprises (which, in its largest example, covers 200,000 people in one of Kenya’s provinces). we learned of the private for-profit insurance programs that differentially select (or cherry-pick) the healthiest patients by excluding others with pre-existing conditions (like HIV)…in fact, like in the US, Kenya has a dizzying fragmented collection of health financing options. and, like in the US, Kenyan patients, especially the most vulnerable, continue to fall through the cracks.












